Hi, I´m new here and not so good in English, but I’ve give it
a try and hope you understand.
The whole idea of the
overlapped generation is not only illogical, there are also serious errors in
reasoning and how to interpret the scripture.
The only
"scriptural argument" that the Governing Body has managed to bring in this
matter is Exodus 1: 6 where they say that a "generation" can be
stretched to cover a longer period than usually meant by a
"generation". But, as said, here are serious problems.
When David Splane
interprets this scripture he says that "that generation" is the same period as Joseph's lifetime, and all people during this time shall be
compared with Joseph's lifetime. Splane states that if someone lived, if only
for 10 minutes, at the same time as Joseph, he belongs to "Joseph's
generation," and this is the great error made because the scripture does
not speak of "Joseph's generation," as if it was his.
It is said:
"Eventually Joseph died, and overpriced all his brothers and all that
generation." What was included in "that generation"? Shortly before,
in verse 5, it states: "And all of Those Who were born to Jacob were 70
people. [...]" So the "generation" spoken of in verse 6 is not
only about Joseph, but also his 11 brothers, and 58 other people, the whole
Jacob's descendants, in all 70 persons. So
you cannot do the thought experiment that David Splane and the Governing Body are doing here and talk
about "Joseph's generation", one cannot "steal" the
generation from Jacob and make it
Josephs, and only have him as reference. The generation started with Jacob
and included at least 70 persons who mostly lived during the same time and experienced the same things, not just one person who you can compare whoever you want with and anytime.
Siblings can be said
to belong to a "generation" because they have the same father, One can then say
that the father started a generation, and when siblings die out, that generation
also dies. That is what clearly mentioned in these verses as I see it.
And the most
important: there is no "overlapping" mention or hinted here.